Rapeseed / Canola

In short: Rapeseed (and its low-erucic-acid variety canola) is a major oilseed carrying roughly 38–44% oil in a small, thin-coated seed that is pressed whole rather than dehulled. At scale it is typically pre-pressed and then solvent-extracted; small mills press it directly. Canola oil's neutral flavor and favorable fatty-acid profile make it a leading commodity cooking oil.

Approximate composition (indicative, self-drawn)

Rapeseed vs canola, and why it is pressed whole

"Rapeseed" is the crop; "canola" is the name for low-erucic-acid, low-glucosinolate varieties bred for food use, now dominant in the food market. The seed is small, round and thin-coated, carrying roughly 38–44% oil. Unlike sunflower, rapeseed is pressed whole — its seed coat is thin, contributes little fiber and separates poorly, so dehulling is impractical and unnecessary. Preparation therefore centers on cleaning, moisture conditioning and often flaking/conditioning rather than decortication. Canola oil's light flavor and low saturated-fat profile have made it one of the world's leading commodity cooking oils.

Engineering schematic (self-drawn) — rapeseed

Processing route: pre-press then extract at scale

Large rapeseed plants commonly pre-press the conditioned seed in a screw press to remove part of the oil, then solvent-extract the cake to recover the rest — a combination that balances throughput and low residual oil. Small mills simply press, accepting higher cake residual in exchange for simplicity and a solvent-free product. Either way the crude oil needs refining: rapeseed oil carries phospholipids and, for a bland retail product, benefits from full degumming, neutralization/physical refining, bleaching and deodorization. Cold-pressed rapeseed oil is also a growing premium category, sold for its color and nutty character rather than as a neutral commodity.

Cake value and market position

Rapeseed/canola meal is a protein feed, valued somewhat below soybean meal but a significant co-product, particularly for ruminants. The crop's strength is its position as a reliable, temperate-climate commodity oil with a favorable nutritional profile, which sustains large, refining-heavy processing chains. For a small mill, cold-pressed rapeseed oil offers a differentiated premium route, while bulk neutral canola oil is a scale-and-refining game better suited to larger operations.

Typical processing route

Cleaning → Pressing / pre-press → Refining → Filtering → Filling

Estimate output for this seed with the oil yield calculator, and choose a route with the cold-vs-hot chooser.

Key figures (indicative)

Parameter	Typical range
Oil content	~38–44%
Preparation	pressed whole (no dehulling)
Route at scale	pre-press + solvent extraction
Refining	usually full (bland commodity oil)
Cake use	protein feed (esp. ruminants)

⚠️ Oil-content, hull and yield figures are indicative ranges from published agronomy — actual values vary by variety, growing conditions and preparation. Verify for your seed. No fabricated numbers.

Rapeseed and canola: the same crop, different grade

"Rapeseed" and "canola" cause endless confusion, so it is worth being precise. Canola is a variety of rapeseed bred to be low in erucic acid and glucosinolates, developed specifically as a food oil. So all canola is rapeseed, but not all rapeseed is canola-grade — traditional high-erucic rapeseed is grown for industrial use, while the low-erucic canola type is the edible oil on supermarket shelves. When a page or label says rapeseed oil for food, it almost always means the canola-grade crop.

Processing route

Rapeseed is a whole-seed crop (not usually dehulled) at about 38–44% oil, and at scale it is typically pre-pressed then solvent-extracted and fully refined into a neutral, high-smoke-point commodity oil. A smaller premium segment is cold-pressed and left unrefined for its flavour and colour. Because canola is naturally high in monounsaturated oleic acid with some omega-3, refined rapeseed/canola oil is a stable, versatile cooking oil. See sunflower vs canola for how it compares with the other major seed oil.

FAQ

Is rapeseed the same as canola?

Canola is a variety of rapeseed bred to be low in erucic acid and glucosinolates for food use. All canola is rapeseed, but traditional high-erucic rapeseed is grown for industrial rather than edible use.

What is the difference between rapeseed and canola?

Canola is a food-grade rapeseed variety bred for low erucic acid and glucosinolates. All canola is rapeseed; not all rapeseed is canola. The processing is essentially the same.

Why is rapeseed not dehulled?

Its seed coat is thin, adds little fiber and separates poorly, so dehulling is impractical. Rapeseed is pressed whole, unlike high-hull seeds such as sunflower.

How much oil does rapeseed contain?

Roughly 38–44% oil, depending on variety and conditions — enough to press economically, and enough to justify pre-press-plus-extraction at large scale.

Does rapeseed oil need refining?

Commodity canola oil is fully refined for a bland, stable product. Cold-pressed rapeseed oil is a growing premium exception, sold unrefined for its flavor and color.

Keep exploring: All oilseeds · Processes · Machines · Calculators · Suppliers

PLAN THIS PROCESSING ROUTE

Rapeseed / canola: from raw material to a supplier brief

Confirm the intended food-grade feed and oil specification before comparing a pressed specialty product with a refined commodity-oil project.

Pressed product

Assess a cold or conditioned pressing route, filtration, storage and packaging for the target product. Confirm preparation and incoming material rather than assuming another oilseed’s line settings apply.

Pre-press plus extraction

Compare an integrated pre-press, cake extraction and refining project. Include meal handling and solvent recovery, and ask for the combined system balance.

Follow the connected stages

Clean the feed — Agree the incoming seed and impurity specification.
Compare pre-pressing — Distinguish a pre-press feeding extraction from a full-press operation.
Evaluate the integrated route — Include extraction only where it belongs in the project design.
Define the finished product — Connect refining scope to the buyer’s oil specification.

Build the equipment shortlist

Preparation equipment · Press equipment · Extraction equipment · Refining equipment

Estimate on a common basis

Compare energy, oil recovery and cake value on a common input basis. A pre-press residual-oil figure cannot be compared directly with a finished full-press cake target.

Size seed throughput · Estimate pressing output · Prepare the budget · Compare oil-and-cake economics

Read the measurement definitions before comparing percentages.

Request comparable supplier information

Browse the relevant equipment category: Oil Press Machines · Solvent Extraction Machines · Refining Machines. Directory inclusion is not a project-fit approval.

Identify the feed, daily input and operating hours; state whether the rate is raw seed, kernels or finished oil.
Specify the oil product and cake or meal acceptance criteria, including the test method and moisture basis.
List included preparation, handling, utilities, finishing and packaging equipment; identify exclusions.
Request a trial or engineering balance for the proposed route, with losses, consumables, maintenance and acceptance conditions stated.

Basis for this route

AOCS explains pre-pressing followed by extraction for canola/rapeseed. FAO notes that thin-coated seeds such as rapeseed can be processed without decortication. AOCS: Solvent extraction; FAO: extraction principles.

Route guidance reviewed 2026-11-01. The linked technical sources support the stated process principles, not every numerical range elsewhere on this page or any supplier capability.

↑ Project stages and downloads

Resolve the route before comparing quotations

Identify rapeseed / canola feed and the intended oil and cake / meal products.
Compare full pressing against pre-pressing plus cake extraction with the same feed and operating hours.
Agree conditioning, oil treatment and any downstream extraction / meal-treatment boundary.

Use the stage finder below to separate preparation, extraction, oil finishing, packaging and residue treatment. A profile may appear because only one of these duties is documented; require a named model and equipment schedule for your actual feed.

Find stage references · Read the complete processing route

Route choices, material streams and equipment handovers

Compare the intended cold/conditioned mechanical route with full pressing or a selected prepress/extraction arrangement on one feed and product basis.

Qualitative route interpretation and editorial buyer/supplier/site-team questions, not a selected plant design, P&ID, operating recipe, mandatory equipment list or accepted performance. Existing indicative figures remain context only. General technical references do not validate supplier crop/model suitability; inherited product scopes and review dates remain unchanged.

Track these streams separately

Prepared seed → the selected press duty → press oil and cake; repeated pressing and solvent extraction are distinct downstream choices.
If cake extraction is chosen, name extracted oil, treated meal and recovery streams separately from first-press oil/cake.
Refining side streams follow the selected oil-treatment sequence. Do not copy a sunflower wax-treatment requirement without actual-oil justification.

Confirm these handovers

Resolve seed preparation, thermal history and whether the quoted press is a prepress or final-press duty.
Define interstage cake transfer, weighing and sampling for the chosen route.
Agree clarification/refining/storage battery limits against the required oil outlet and utilities.

Equipment categories and subtype scope · Supplier references by process stage · Existing interface responsibility matrix · Quote and test-data comparison

Equipment and subtypes for this Rapeseed / canola route

Use this map to distinguish process duties, equipment alternatives and conditional branches. The linked equipment guides expose existing supplier families and their exact reviewed scope; none is selected or approved here.

Editorial equipment taxonomy and project-selection questions, not a plant design, mandatory machine list, supplier ranking or crop/model performance approval. Product names, scope and source notes are inherited unchanged from existing reviewed supplier references; supplier-level crop relationships must not be promoted to product-level suitability. Current supply and project configurations require direct confirmation.

Preparation equipment

Define the actual seed and prepared feed. Discuss flaking/extrusion only for the selected train; do not assume sunflower-style dehulling is a required step.

Compare / define first: Cleaning, destoning and metal removal, Cookers and conditioners.

Conditional branches or alternatives: Cracking mills, Flaking mills, Dehulling / groundnut shelling, Oilseed extruders, Roasting equipment.

Mechanical pressing

Compare full-press and prepress/extraction duties using a consistent seed basis; cold-press and heat-conditioned routes need distinct configuration discussions.

Compare / define first: Full-press / final-press screw equipment.

Conditional branches or alternatives: Prepress screw equipment, Batch hydraulic presses.

Solvent extraction and recovery

Include cake extraction and its supporting systems only for the selected prepress/extraction branch; confirm meal and recovery scope together.

Compare / define first: None imposed by this map.

Conditional branches or alternatives: Solvent extractors, Meal desolventizer / toaster, Meal dryer / cooler, Miscella distillation equipment, Solvent recovery and associated systems.

Clarification and filtration

Choose press-oil clarification alternatives on representative oil; specify refining separation independently if the refining branch is selected.

Compare / define first: Plate / plate-and-frame filters, Pressure-leaf filters, Press-oil decanters.

Conditional branches or alternatives: Disc-stack / refining separators.

Refining and finishing

Compare the required pressed-oil or refined-oil outlet. Any dewaxing/winterization decision needs actual-oil and product-target justification, not a default sunflower specification.

Compare / define first: None imposed by this map.

Conditional branches or alternatives: Degumming and phase-separation equipment, Neutralization, washing and drying equipment, Bleaching vessels and spent-media separation, Deodorization and vacuum systems, Dewaxing / winterization equipment.

Material transfer

Match seed, cake and meal transfer duties to the chosen pressing/extraction train.

Compare / define first: Elevators, screws and belt conveyors.

Conditional branches or alternatives: None imposed by this map.

Seed and oil storage

Distinguish seed lot, crude-oil and released finished-oil storage and sampling boundaries.

Compare / define first: Seed bins and silos, Crude and finished-oil tanks.

Conditional branches or alternatives: None imposed by this map.

Filling and packaging

Confirm package/outlet first, then compare dosing and closure equipment against actual oil and containers.

Compare / define first: None imposed by this map.

Conditional branches or alternatives: Piston / volumetric oil fillers, Net-weight oil fillers, Capping and closure handling.

Existing representative enquiry example: Farmet CP2 — two-stage cold-pressing enquiry example. Request press model, count and revision for both stages, not only the CP2 name. Do not import the FS4015 machines from a historical project or the FE 500 / FS 350 pairing from EP1. Confirm your crop lot and chosen cold-press definition.

Explore the complete equipment taxonomy · Find supplier references by stage · Continue to the existing equipment enquiry

FIND · COMPARE · PREPARE

Find supplier references by processing stage

Browse 156 supplier profiles and 361 published product/process references. A source review means the published offering was read, not that current supply or your crop configuration has been verified. Stage filters describe documented duties; read the route note and individual product scope together.

More document links and evidence guidance

How evidence is grouped and what to request next. Source categories describe the material reviewed; they are not supplier grades.

Prepare an equipment scope and test-data request.

Compare quotations and test records on a common basis.

Agree interface responsibilities and delivery records.

Plan a representative trial and request FAT/SAT deliverables.

Prepare dispatch, site startup and issue-closeout records.

Oilseed routeProcessing stageSource materialCompany, product or country

Compare scope and prepare an enquiry

0 of 3 profiles selected

Loading supplier references… The complete directory remains below.

The download is an editable draft with source links and blank project fields. It sends no enquiry. Related brand profiles may share a group or sales channel: CPM / Crown, BEST / ABC references and the Huatai branding on Oil-Press-Machine.com need separate identity checks.

Read the complete original reference list · Understand listing status · Check measurement bases

Public evidence: configuration and test-record follow-up

These additions qualify public supplier evidence. They do not establish stock, a buyer-material result, serial-number traceability or signed FAT/SAT acceptance. Requests below are editorial procurement questions, not supplier promises. Existing dossiers and source limits remain applicable.

French Oil Mill Machinery — L-250: define the trial build and oil-collection boundary
Use the checklist alongside the existing historical Can Pro account; it does not identify that project's laboratory machine.
CPM / Crown Iron Works — GIC: specify the historian export and sample-to-run link
Canola/rapeseed is listed; specify the proposed pilot scope, meal treatment and sample-linked records.
Reinartz — AP08 rapeseed experiment: material, machine and methods
Rapeseed/AP08 research with explicit methods; batch and machine traceability remain pending.
Olexa — MBU20 rapeseed cake: same-batch split, downstream boundary
Same-batch rapeseed-cake comparison names MBU20 upstream; original batch/assay records remain pending.
Farmet — Uno rapeseed attachment: oil/cake summaries, not raw batch files
Uno/rapeseed analytical supplement supports sample-record requests; original batch/instrument files remain pending.

Continue with the equipment enquiry, quote/test comparison and trial and acceptance plan.

Reviewed 2026-11-04. No supplier outreach or buyer trial is claimed in this update.

↑ Project stages and downloads

Official-source supplier references for this route

Compare these documented product/process offerings with your project brief. They are reference entries, not ranked recommendations. A stage-level connection does not mean the supplier has approved your complete line.

Each profile links to the official product pages and states what still needs supplier confirmation.

Rapeseed / canola: representative trial and acceptance plan

REPRESENTATIVE MATERIAL · TRIAL RECORD · FAT / SAT · HANDOVER

Rapeseed / canola: representative trial and acceptance plan

Editorial trial-planning and deliverable checklist; not a completed trial, manufacturer-issued acceptance standard, legal product limit or signed customer report.

Confirm seed identity and compare full pressing with pre-press/extraction on a consistent basis.

Download blank Rapeseed / canola trial / acceptance checklist

All sample quantities, settings, run duration/repeats, performance limits, decision rules, responsibilities and signatures remain blank for buyer, supplier and laboratory agreement.

1. Feed passport and representative sampling

Identify the actual rapeseed/canola variety and lot, storage history, moisture, fines and intended oil/meal markets; mustard references are not substituted.
Agree any chlorophyll, fatty-acid profile and meal analyses needed for the actual product; identify the laboratory method and reporting basis.

2. Planned comparisons and observations

Compare full-press and pre-press/cake-extraction proposals only with the same defined feed, operating hours and output specifications.
Record conditioning, press setup/cooling, oil and cake/meal temperatures, feed/output quantities and utility use.
Where refining or pigment treatment is proposed, use the actual crude oil and document before/after analyses and oil losses with the treatment boundary.

3. Outputs and the selection decision

Feed/oil/cake or meal balance and residual-oil reports with matching analytical and moisture bases.
Agreed oil-quality, chlorophyll/fatty-acid or meal reports as applicable, raw process logs and a production scale-up review.

Selection boundary: Do not transfer a mustard claim or one historical canola setup to a different crop lot, press or product specification.

Six stages of a traceable trial record

Laboratory methods: select the matrix and edition

Only public publisher scopes are summarized. The laboratory must select the applicable full method/edition, actual matrix, calibration and reporting limits. Revision drafts are not treated as published replacements.

Reference	Requested measurement	Scope limit
ISO 21294:2017	Oilseed sampling plan	Published edition; revision draft is separate. Agree lot and sampling scope.
ISO 665:2020	Oilseed moisture and volatile matter	Record method edition and basis; a quick-meter result needs appropriate calibration.
ISO 659:2009	Analytical extractable oil in oilseeds	Not production recovery. Sunflower sample preparation has an additional moisture consideration.
ISO 734:2023	Residual extractable oil in pressed or extracted meals	Confirm meal matrix and moisture basis; compounded products are excluded.
ISO 660:2020	Oil acid value / acidity	State acid value or calculated-acidity basis; results are not acid-species-specific.
ISO 3960:2017	Oil peroxide value	Record sample handling/time; this result alone does not establish shelf life.

Quality-measurement context: Canadian Grain Commission — oilseed quality methods. Confirm the current laboratory method for chlorophyll, fatty-acid or other requested analyses; this overview does not set this project's product limits.

FAT, SAT and handover: eight delivery groups

These are editorial document requests to agree with the buyer, supplier and laboratory. They are not a manufacturer-issued test standard or a completed customer report.

ID / when	Delivery group	Content to agree and retain
D01 Before testing / FAT	Approved scope and acceptance matrix	Contracting/manufacturing parties, equipment and revision list, included/excluded preparation, extraction, oil treatment, packaging and utilities; each criterion with method, units, basis, agreed limit, witness and decision rule.
D02 Before and during trial	Feed and sample traceability	Lot/variety and preparation history, sampling plan, chain of custody, sample IDs, retained splits, feed certificates and actual tested quantities.
D03 Before measured tests	Measurement and configuration records	Instrument IDs and suitable calibration records, sampling locations, laboratory scope, machine settings/revisions, software/recipe versions where applicable and approved operating envelope.
D04 Factory acceptance test (FAT)	Witnessed factory test record	Approved test procedure, actual test medium/feed, checks possible at the factory, raw results, limitations and deferred site-only tests. Record whether it was dry, simulated or actual-feed testing; they are not interchangeable.
D05 Trial / FAT / SAT	Raw data and analytical package	Time-series run logs, quantities and mass/oil-balance boundaries, utilities, sample-linked lab reports, units and moisture basis, uncertainty/reporting limits, calculations and repeat-run variability.
D06 Before release / after retest	Deviation and retest register	Criterion-by-criterion results, discrepancies, agreed actions, owners/dates, authorized concessions where applicable, retest evidence and closure. An unresolved item must remain visible.
D07 Site acceptance test (SAT)	Site installation and performance record	Installed equipment/revision checks, actual site utilities and feed, agreed commissioning and performance tests, product/cake/meal results, witnessed data and outstanding work. A factory demonstration does not replace site acceptance.
D08 Handover	Authorized release and operating file	Authorized buyer/supplier decisions and signatures, agreed performance scope and exceptions, as-built documents, operating/cleaning/maintenance guidance, training, wear/spare-parts schedule and service contacts.

Published implementation example: Neostarpack — sample evaluation, FAT and site testing workflow. This example concerns packaging; it does not validate a seed-processing line or prove signed acceptance.

Fields for each agreed acceptance criterion

Criterion and matrix · method/edition · sample IDs · unit and analytical/moisture basis · agreed limit and decision rule · actual result · uncertainty/reporting limit · deviation/retest · authorized decision/date.

Keep the result and sign-off fields blank until the actual test and authorized review are completed. Record site-only tests separately from factory dry or simulated checks.

Follow the documented trial-support scope

These existing profiles offer source-linked support descriptions; confirm the actual seed, equipment, samples, availability and written deliverables. They are not independent trial-site counts or endorsements.

Return to the processing route · Review evidence and open requests · Compare supplier scope and prepare a brief

↑ Project stages and downloads

Rapeseed / canola equipment enquiry

EQUIPMENT SCOPE · TEST DATA · REQUEST FOR QUOTATION

Rapeseed / canola equipment enquiry

Buyer-editable equipment-scope and test-data requests. Representative catalogue examples are starting points for an enquiry, not a supplier ranking, final size selection, quotation, order or accepted performance.

Farmet CP2 — two-stage cold-pressing enquiry example

Farmet presents CP2 as first-stage and final pressing with oil separation/filtration and FIC controls, and identifies rapeseed/canola among its applications. CP2 is a configured technology; it does not identify a universal fixed press model.

Confirm before selection: Request press model, count and revision for both stages, not only the CP2 name. Do not import the FS4015 machines from a historical project or the FE 500 / FS 350 pairing from EP1. Confirm your crop lot and chosen cold-press definition.

Download Rapeseed / canola equipment / test-data RFQ

Published facts are limited to the linked official catalogue/service descriptions. All scope lines, tests, commercial terms and acceptance requests below are editorial questions for written agreement; current supply, crop fit, trial access and results remain unconfirmed. No enquiry is sent.

Define the quoted process boundary

Initial enquiry: actual rapeseed/canola feed through two mechanical press stages to clarified oil and cake. Temperature stabilization, cleaning, optional dehulling, oil treatment and storage are separate scope decisions. No solvent line is implied.

Buyer inputs to complete before an enquiry

Project / site / country and intended commissioning date: ____________________
Actual oilseed variety/lot, raw or prepared feed, moisture and analytical oil basis: ____________________
Required daily input, operating hours, turndown and feed variability: ____________________
Oil and cake/meal destinations, specifications and required analyses: ____________________
Available space, utilities, electrical supply and local requirements: ____________________
Requested process boundary, optional stages, buyer-supplied equipment and interfaces: ____________________
Representative sample quantity/shipping terms to agree with test provider: ____________________
Buyer technical/commercial contact and response deadline: ____________________

Six equipment-scope lines for the supplier response

For every line, request model/count/revision, inclusion or option status, interface owner and an itemized price reference. Inclusion is to be agreed; these lines are not the manufacturer’s standard delivery list.

ID / equipment	Request in the quotation
E01 · Reception, cleaning and temperature stabilization	Itemize feed bin, cleaning, weighing and optional stabilization/dehulling. Define actual incoming seed range and the supplier-approved response to low-temperature feed.
E02 · First-stage press bank	Specify each press model/count, feeder, screw/cage configuration, drive/control and first-stage cake/oil measurement points. State redundancy and turndown assumptions.
E03 · Interstage transfer and final press bank	Specify cake conveying, final press model/count and settings, interstage sampling and bypass/recycle rules. Define how the two stages form the offered operating envelope.
E04 · Oil separation and filtration	Itemize settling/separation, pumps, filter type/consumables and solids handling; distinguish each stage oil stream from blended clarified oil and any treatment/storage option.
E05 · Cake and product treatment interfaces	Define final cake cooling/conveying/packing and any refining/pigment-treatment option on actual crude oil; request separate scopes for additional product claims.
E06 · FIC and site services	Request FIC hardware/software and data-export scope, utility and foundation loads, local electrical interfaces, wear parts, installation/training and factory/site test allocation.

Eight test-data requests linked to D01–D08

Request editable raw files plus traceable laboratory reports, not only a summary video or catalogue percentage. The linked trial plan supplies method-scope references; the supplier and laboratory must agree the actual method and acceptance criteria.

ID / data request	Fields to provide	Basis and delivery link
R01 · Offered equipment and trial-machine mapping	Revision-controlled equipment schedule; model/count/serial or trial ID; screw/cage/die, drive/control and option list; differences between trial and production build.	Supply drawings/BOM and a written scale-up/uncertainty note; identify every untested assumption. D01 / D03
R02 · Feed, sampling and laboratory baseline	Lot/cultivar/storage, preparation, moisture/volatile matter and analytical extractable oil; sample register, retained splits, method edition and lab identity.	State raw/prepared feed, units and wet/dry basis. Analytical extractable oil is not production oil recovery. D02 / D05
R03 · Measured-run raw data	Timestamped feed, run/stabilization periods, downtime, temperatures, load and utilities, calibration references and planned repeats.	Request editable CSV/XLSX plus run/configuration IDs; separate startup and steady operation, and define kg/h and kWh/t denominators. D03 / D05
R04 · Matched products and balance workbook	Feed, oil, cake and any hull/fines/reject/water streams; inventory changes and recycle; matched oil/cake samples and residual-oil results.	Request editable mass/oil calculations and laboratory reports with method/basis/uncertainty; distinguish filtered oil, crude oil and analytical oil. D02 / D05
R05 · Performance offer and factory/site decision matrix	For each proposed guarantee: value/unit, feed envelope, run duration, method, basis, decision rule, witness/authority, deviations/retest and FAT versus site-only SAT allocation.	Ask supplier to separate indicative estimates from contractual offers; limits, actual results and signatures stay blank until agreement/testing. D01 / D04 / D06 / D07 / D08
R06 · Two-stage operating and mass balance	First-stage and final-stage feed/output samples, oil/cake masses, configurations, actual settings and recycle/hold-up observations.	Report stage and overall balances on one declared feed/moisture basis; do not sum recycled material as fresh input. D03 / D05
R07 · Cold-press temperature evidence	Incoming seed, stabilization if used, stage oil/cake temperatures and ambient/utility conditions over the measured period.	Agree measurement points and product definition before testing; the technology name is not an accepted temperature guarantee. D01 / D03 / D05
R08 · Oil and meal/cake market analyses	Actual cultivar/lot, chlorophyll/fatty-acid and cake analyses where requested, method/edition, matrix, units, sample IDs and laboratory results.	Do not replace rapeseed/canola data with mustard data or one historical project. Additional treatment requires a separate actual-oil test. D02 / D05 / D07

Commercial terms, service and a comparable offer

Itemized base equipment, optional packages and buyer-supplied exclusions
Trial fee, required sample quantity, booking, shipping/return and report access terms
Equipment price/currency, quote validity, named delivery place and proposed Incoterms edition/rule
Production/delivery schedule and installation/commissioning responsibilities
Payment milestones, warranty, service and consumable/wear-part scope
Utility requirements, drawings/document language, controls/data-export and training
Proposed performance terms and FAT/SAT protocol; deferred checks and retest responsibilities
Customer-authorized comparable reference and available signed records, with permission and confidentiality limits

Response fields for each criterion: Offered model / quantity / revision · Included / optional / excluded / buyer-supplied, plus interface owner · Value / unit / feed and moisture basis / method and edition · Document ID / date / raw-data link / laboratory / calibration · Indicative or contractual / limits to agree / deviations / open questions.

Keep proposed values separate from agreed guarantees, measured results and authorized release. Record open items, responsible parties, due dates and deferred site tests.

Official catalogue and trial-service basis

Official pages reviewed 2026-11-03. These sources support the stated catalogue/service scope, not the editorial inclusion list, agreed tests, booking, stock or signed acceptance.

Existing supplier evidence and limits · Trial method scope and D01–D08 delivery register · Processing route · Compare documented suppliers

↑ Project stages and downloads

Rapeseed / canola quotation and test-data comparison

COMMON BASIS · THREE OFFER COLUMNS · EVIDENCE AND OPEN ITEMS

Rapeseed / canola quotation and test-data comparison

Blank buyer comparison framework for up to three offers on the same agreed route and feed basis. It contains no supplier replies, quoted prices, measured results, automatic scores or acceptance decisions.

Editorial comparison questions reuse the existing source-bounded RFQ and trial plans. No new supplier capability or test-result claim is introduced. A catalogue description, a quotation, raw test data, a laboratory report and an authorized FAT/SAT decision remain separate evidence types.

Download blank Rapeseed / canola comparison CSV · Column and status guide (TXT)

Offer A, B and C are blank labels. Complete the 25-column CSV with original values/units, each offer’s reporting basis, evidence type and source ID/date; use the separate status, gap/action, owner, due date and decision-reference columns. The page below previews the same 41 criteria; its empty cells contain no supplier response.

Before comparing: seven common-basis rules

Complete B01–B08 before treating prices or performance as comparable. The common format does not make different crops, process routes, capacities or output specifications equivalent.
Keep each offer’s original value/unit, reporting basis, evidence type and source ID/date. Put any buyer conversion/reconciliation in the separate gap/action field with its assumptions; retain the original.
Leave unknowns blank and flag missing data; absence is not zero, compliance, failure or proof that a supplier lacks the capability.
Use row statuses to manage clarification, not to rank supplier quality. Comparable on an agreed basis is not passed acceptance or a buying recommendation.
Check inclusions and cost boundaries before totals; separate quoted amounts from buyer estimates, taxes/freight/installation assumptions and any recorded currency conversion.
Keep proposed guarantees, agreed criteria, actual results, deviations/retests and authorized sign-off separate. FAT simulation and a site SAT cover different scopes.
Record a responsible person, due date and decision reference for every unresolved item. No enquiry is sent and no file is uploaded by these downloads.

Common project and reporting basis · 8 rows

Criterion and link	Required comparison basis	Offer A blank	Offer B blank	Offer C blank
B01 · Offer identity and revision Buyer project / commercial response D01	Record legal supplier/manufacturer, offer ID/date/revision, validity and contact for each A/B/C column. Keep revised and superseded offers traceable.	—	—	—
B02 · Actual feed and lot basis Buyer inputs / R02 D02	State crop/cultivar/lot, raw or prepared feed, moisture, hulls/fines and analytical oil basis. Do not compare different lots or preparation as equivalent without an agreed reconciliation.	—	—	—
B03 · Common process boundary E01–E06 / buyer boundary D01	Define the same inlet and outlet, included stages, optional packages, buyer-supplied items, recycles and exclusions before comparing prices or results.	—	—	—
B04 · Input rate and operating time Buyer inputs / R03–R04 D01 / D05	Separate seed/kernel input, crude or filtered oil output and cake/meal. State units, daily operating hours, downtime and wet/dry basis; a catalogue crushing rate is not oil output.	—	—	—
B05 · Product and analysis specification Buyer inputs / R02 / R05 D01 / D05	List intended oil/cake/meal destinations, agreed quality criteria, matrices, method editions, units and reporting limits. Blank or unmatched specifications remain open items.	—	—	—
B06 · Site and utility boundary Buyer inputs / equipment scope D01 / D03 / D07	Use the same voltage/frequency, available heat/cooling, civil/installation interfaces and utility cost boundary. Separate installed drive rating from measured consumption.	—	—	—
B07 · Trial versus production configuration R01 D03 / D07	Record actual trial machine and offered production model/count/revision, configuration differences and the written scale-up assumptions. A pilot result does not release a production line.	—	—	—
B08 · Measured-run and sampling window R02–R05 D02 / D03 / D04 / D05 / D07	State stabilization, measured period, repeats, sampling times, retained samples and calibration references. Separate factory simulation, actual-feed test and site operation.	—	—	—

Equipment inclusion and interfaces · 6 rows

Criterion and link	Required comparison basis	Offer A blank	Offer B blank	Offer C blank
E01 · Reception, cleaning and temperature stabilization E01 D01 / D03	Itemize feed bin, cleaning, weighing and optional stabilization/dehulling. Define actual incoming seed range and the supplier-approved response to low-temperature feed. Compare model/count/revision, inclusion status and interface owner.	—	—	—
E02 · First-stage press bank E02 D01 / D03	Specify each press model/count, feeder, screw/cage configuration, drive/control and first-stage cake/oil measurement points. State redundancy and turndown assumptions. Compare model/count/revision, inclusion status and interface owner.	—	—	—
E03 · Interstage transfer and final press bank E03 D01 / D03	Specify cake conveying, final press model/count and settings, interstage sampling and bypass/recycle rules. Define how the two stages form the offered operating envelope. Compare model/count/revision, inclusion status and interface owner.	—	—	—
E04 · Oil separation and filtration E04 D01 / D03	Itemize settling/separation, pumps, filter type/consumables and solids handling; distinguish each stage oil stream from blended clarified oil and any treatment/storage option. Compare model/count/revision, inclusion status and interface owner.	—	—	—
E05 · Cake and product treatment interfaces E05 D01 / D03	Define final cake cooling/conveying/packing and any refining/pigment-treatment option on actual crude oil; request separate scopes for additional product claims. Compare model/count/revision, inclusion status and interface owner.	—	—	—
E06 · FIC and site services E06 D01 / D03	Request FIC hardware/software and data-export scope, utility and foundation loads, local electrical interfaces, wear parts, installation/training and factory/site test allocation. Compare model/count/revision, inclusion status and interface owner.	—	—	—

Quotation, commercial terms and cost boundary · 8 rows

Criterion and link	Required comparison basis	Offer A blank	Offer B blank	Offer C blank
C01 · Itemized base equipment, optional packages and buyer-supplied exclusions Commercial response 1 D01 / D08	Compare base price, itemized options, exclusions and buyer-supplied costs on one scope; keep supplier quotations separate from buyer estimates. Do not double-count packages or treat an empty cost as zero.	—	—	—
C02 · Trial fee, required sample quantity, booking, shipping/return and report access terms Commercial response 2 D01 / D08	Keep test fee, sample quantity/handling, shipping/return, booking, report access and any confidentiality terms distinct from equipment cost.	—	—	—
C03 · Equipment price/currency, quote validity, named delivery place and proposed Incoterms edition/rule Commercial response 3 D01 / D08	Retain original currency, price unit, delivery place/rule and validity. Any buyer conversion needs its date, source/rate and cost boundary recorded separately; this template supplies no exchange rate or landed-cost total.	—	—	—
C04 · Production/delivery schedule and installation/commissioning responsibilities Commercial response 4 D01 / D08	Compare the same delivery and startup milestones, site readiness assumptions, travel/logistics and the responsible party for each activity.	—	—	—
C05 · Payment milestones, warranty, service and consumable/wear-part scope Commercial response 5 D01 / D08	Separate payment milestones, warranty conditions, service response and spare/wear parts. Record unresolved terms rather than assuming equal coverage.	—	—	—
C06 · Utility requirements, drawings/document language, controls/data-export and training Commercial response 6 D01 / D08	Compare document/control/data-export scope, utility requirements, drawings/language and operator training on the agreed project boundary.	—	—	—
C07 · Proposed performance terms and FAT/SAT protocol; deferred checks and retest responsibilities Commercial response 7 D01 / D08	Distinguish indicative estimates from proposed contractual commitments, agreed limits, measured results and authorized release. Record FAT/SAT allocation and retest responsibility.	—	—	—
C08 · Customer-authorized comparable reference and available signed records, with permission and confidentiality limits Commercial response 8 D01 / D08	Record permission, scope, crop, configuration and date for a comparable customer reference. Catalogue text, a testimonial or a photo is not a signed project acceptance dataset.	—	—	—

Test records and reporting basis · 8 rows

Criterion and link	Required comparison basis	Offer A blank	Offer B blank	Offer C blank
R01 · Offered equipment and trial-machine mapping R01 D01 / D03	Revision-controlled equipment schedule; model/count/serial or trial ID; screw/cage/die, drive/control and option list; differences between trial and production build. Supply drawings/BOM and a written scale-up/uncertainty note; identify every untested assumption.	—	—	—
R02 · Feed, sampling and laboratory baseline R02 D02 / D05	Lot/cultivar/storage, preparation, moisture/volatile matter and analytical extractable oil; sample register, retained splits, method edition and lab identity. State raw/prepared feed, units and wet/dry basis. Analytical extractable oil is not production oil recovery.	—	—	—
R03 · Measured-run raw data R03 D03 / D05	Timestamped feed, run/stabilization periods, downtime, temperatures, load and utilities, calibration references and planned repeats. Request editable CSV/XLSX plus run/configuration IDs; separate startup and steady operation, and define kg/h and kWh/t denominators.	—	—	—
R04 · Matched products and balance workbook R04 D02 / D05	Feed, oil, cake and any hull/fines/reject/water streams; inventory changes and recycle; matched oil/cake samples and residual-oil results. Request editable mass/oil calculations and laboratory reports with method/basis/uncertainty; distinguish filtered oil, crude oil and analytical oil.	—	—	—
R05 · Performance offer and factory/site decision matrix R05 D01 / D04 / D06 / D07 / D08	For each proposed guarantee: value/unit, feed envelope, run duration, method, basis, decision rule, witness/authority, deviations/retest and FAT versus site-only SAT allocation. Ask supplier to separate indicative estimates from contractual offers; limits, actual results and signatures stay blank until agreement/testing.	—	—	—
R06 · Two-stage operating and mass balance R06 D03 / D05	First-stage and final-stage feed/output samples, oil/cake masses, configurations, actual settings and recycle/hold-up observations. Report stage and overall balances on one declared feed/moisture basis; do not sum recycled material as fresh input.	—	—	—
R07 · Cold-press temperature evidence R07 D01 / D03 / D05	Incoming seed, stabilization if used, stage oil/cake temperatures and ambient/utility conditions over the measured period. Agree measurement points and product definition before testing; the technology name is not an accepted temperature guarantee.	—	—	—
R08 · Oil and meal/cake market analyses R08 D02 / D05 / D07	Actual cultivar/lot, chlorophyll/fatty-acid and cake analyses where requested, method/edition, matrix, units, sample IDs and laboratory results. Do not replace rapeseed/canola data with mustard data or one historical project. Additional treatment requires a separate actual-oil test.	—	—	—

FAT, SAT and handover evidence · 8 rows

Criterion and link	Required comparison basis	Offer A blank	Offer B blank	Offer C blank
D01 · Approved scope and acceptance matrix R05 / acceptance register D01	Contracting/manufacturing parties, equipment and revision list, included/excluded preparation, extraction, oil treatment, packaging and utilities; each criterion with method, units, basis, agreed limit, witness and decision rule. Record document/revision, receipt/review, deviations and authorized status; no status is implied by this blank row.	—	—	—
D02 · Feed and sample traceability R05 / acceptance register D02	Lot/variety and preparation history, sampling plan, chain of custody, sample IDs, retained splits, feed certificates and actual tested quantities. Record document/revision, receipt/review, deviations and authorized status; no status is implied by this blank row.	—	—	—
D03 · Measurement and configuration records R05 / acceptance register D03	Instrument IDs and suitable calibration records, sampling locations, laboratory scope, machine settings/revisions, software/recipe versions where applicable and approved operating envelope. Record document/revision, receipt/review, deviations and authorized status; no status is implied by this blank row.	—	—	—
D04 · Witnessed factory test record R05 / acceptance register D04	Approved test procedure, actual test medium/feed, checks possible at the factory, raw results, limitations and deferred site-only tests. Record whether it was dry, simulated or actual-feed testing; they are not interchangeable. Record document/revision, receipt/review, deviations and authorized status; no status is implied by this blank row.	—	—	—
D05 · Raw data and analytical package R05 / acceptance register D05	Time-series run logs, quantities and mass/oil-balance boundaries, utilities, sample-linked lab reports, units and moisture basis, uncertainty/reporting limits, calculations and repeat-run variability. Record document/revision, receipt/review, deviations and authorized status; no status is implied by this blank row.	—	—	—
D06 · Deviation and retest register R05 / acceptance register D06	Criterion-by-criterion results, discrepancies, agreed actions, owners/dates, authorized concessions where applicable, retest evidence and closure. An unresolved item must remain visible. Record document/revision, receipt/review, deviations and authorized status; no status is implied by this blank row.	—	—	—
D07 · Site installation and performance record R05 / acceptance register D07	Installed equipment/revision checks, actual site utilities and feed, agreed commissioning and performance tests, product/cake/meal results, witnessed data and outstanding work. A factory demonstration does not replace site acceptance. Record document/revision, receipt/review, deviations and authorized status; no status is implied by this blank row.	—	—	—
D08 · Authorized release and operating file R05 / acceptance register D08	Authorized buyer/supplier decisions and signatures, agreed performance scope and exceptions, as-built documents, operating/cleaning/maintenance guidance, training, wear/spare-parts schedule and service contacts. Record document/revision, receipt/review, deviations and authorized status; no status is implied by this blank row.	—	—	—

Crop-specific comparability checks · 3 rows

Criterion and link	Required comparison basis	Offer A blank	Offer B blank	Offer C blank
X01 · Two press stages and overall balance E02–E03 / R06 D03 / D05	Request model/count/revision and measured streams for both stages, including interstage recycle/hold-up. Reconcile the overall balance rather than adding recycled material as new input.	—	—	—
X02 · Cold-press definition and temperature evidence E01–E03 / R07 D01 / D03 / D05	Match incoming feed, any stabilization, measurement locations and oil/cake temperature traces to an agreed product definition; the technology name is not a temperature guarantee.	—	—	—
X03 · Actual crop and product-quality analyses E04–E05 / R08 D02 / D05 / D07	Keep rapeseed/canola variety/lot distinct from mustard; compare requested chlorophyll/fatty-acid and cake data on agreed methods, separating any additional actual-oil treatment.	—	—	—

Evidence types, row status and unresolved items

Evidence type: Catalogue / service description · Supplier quotation / clarification · Raw trial record · Laboratory report · Factory FAT record · Site SAT record · Authorized decision / sign-off.

Comparison status: Awaiting response · Basis mismatch · Clarification needed · Comparable on agreed basis · Not applicable — agreed with reference.

These are worksheet labels, not supplier grades. A comparable row does not mean passed acceptance. Keep the actual document/date, basis mismatch, requested clarification, owner, due date and authorized decision separate. Missing or not-applicable entries need a reason; do not silently count them as zero or passed.

Existing equipment RFQ template · Existing trial / acceptance checklist

RFQ scope and source limits · D01–D08 delivery register · Compare documented supplier profiles · Processing route

↑ Project stages and downloads

Rapeseed / canola interface responsibility and delivery matrix

BUYER · EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER · SITE TEAM · OPEN AGREEMENTS

Rapeseed / canola interface responsibility and delivery matrix

Editorial interface-confirmation matrix linking buyer, equipment supplier and site team questions to deliverables. It proposes topics to agree; it does not assign contractual duties, authorize site work, approve a design or record completed acceptance.

Role labels are discussion headings, not agreed RACI assignments. Parties may delegate work; actual legal parties, responsible owner, reviewer/approver, scope, due dates and sign-off remain blank until project agreement. Existing catalogue/service evidence does not establish who performs a project interface.

Download blank Rapeseed / canola interface register · Interface guide (TXT)

The three columns below are confirmation questions. They are not assigned duties. Complete actual parties, agreed scope, owner/checker/approver, due date, evidence and sign-off in the downloaded register.

Seven rules for an agreed interface

Name actual parties and package boundaries before assigning an owner. Keep proposed questions separate from the signed scope and its revision.
Record who provides the input, who supplies/installs/connects the item, who checks it and who has decision authority; they may be different parties.
Use actual drawing/connection IDs, inlet/outlet conditions and included/optional/excluded status. Leave missing conditions open rather than inferring a catalogue value.
Link each interface to RFQ E/R items, comparison B/E/C/R/D/X rows and the D01–D08 register. Preserve original documents and changes.
Agree review points and readiness criteria before work/testing; suggested review points below are not binding milestones or universal technical limits.
Separate factory dry/simulated checks, actual-feed trials, site checks, deviations/retests and authorized release. A marked document receipt is not a passed interface.
Keep unresolved items with an owner, due date, required evidence and decision reference. No enquiry is sent and no project data is uploaded by these blank downloads.

Project and feed boundary · 2 interfaces

Interface / suggested review	Buyer: confirm	Equipment supplier: confirm	Site team: confirm
I01 · Contracting parties, scope and interface register Review point to agree: Before scope and layout agreement	Identify project owner, intended process/output and the people authorized to agree scope and changes. Confirm any delegated buyer role.	Identify the quoting/contracting manufacturer, package boundaries, subcontracted items, exclusions and who can approve revisions.	Identify installation, utilities, controls and laboratory participants; clarify which works their contracts cover.
Deliverable to agree: Agreed party list, package/inlet/outlet boundaries, interface drawings and revision/change register. RFQ: Buyer inputs / E01–E06 · Comparison: B01 / B03 / C01 · Acceptance: D01
I02 · Feed supply, reception and product destinations Review point to agree: Before equipment sizing and sample shipment	Define crop/cultivar/lot, input basis, availability, storage history and intended oil/cake/meal destinations; identify sample and feed providers.	State accepted inlet specification, reception/weighing needs and any preparation/treatment exclusions in the offered scope.	Confirm receiving/storage routes, actual transfer points, weighing access and who handles rejects or returned samples.
Deliverable to agree: Lot/feed specification, material-flow sketch, sampling ownership and product/outlet schedule. RFQ: Buyer inputs / E01 / R02 · Comparison: B02 / B04 / B05 · Acceptance: D01 / D02

Site, electrical and utilities · 3 interfaces

Interface / suggested review	Buyer: confirm	Equipment supplier: confirm	Site team: confirm
I03 · Layout, foundations, unloading and access Review point to agree: Before civil work and equipment dispatch	Provide site constraints, access and building information; identify who commissions local civil/layout reviews and delivery reception.	Provide offered equipment loads, dimensions, maintenance clearances, lifting/handling information and installation interface drawings.	Confirm site measurements, foundation/anchor and access compatibility, unloading/rigging work scope and any unresolved design inputs.
Deliverable to agree: Revision-controlled layout, load/foundation interface records, delivery/installation plan and open items. RFQ: E01–E06 / commercial response · Comparison: B03 / B06 / C04 · Acceptance: D01 / D03 / D04
I04 · Power, drives and electrical connection boundary Review point to agree: Before electrical design freeze and energization	Confirm available supply data and which party provides upstream distribution, cables, local works and approvals for the actual site.	Specify connected/operating loads, voltage/frequency, motor/drive/control scope, connection points and required commissioning checks.	Confirm local design/installation responsibility, cable/termination boundaries, grounding and protective/control interface review by the responsible specialists.
Deliverable to agree: Electrical load list, connection drawings, responsibility split and recorded pre-start checks. RFQ: E01–E06 / R01 / R03 · Comparison: B06 / B07 / C06 · Acceptance: D03 / D04 / D07
I05 · Steam, water, cooling and utility return Review point to agree: Before utility design and actual-feed testing	Identify available utility conditions, supply reliability, metering and who supplies generation, treatment and external networks.	State actual package requirements and connection/return points; distinguish included conditioning/cooling equipment from external utility systems.	Confirm piping, isolation/drainage/return interfaces, instruments and installation checks within the agreed local work scope.
Deliverable to agree: Utility schedule, inlet/return boundary drawings, metering basis and any unavailable service or deferred check. RFQ: E01–E06 / R03 · Comparison: B06 / C06 / R03 · Acceptance: D01 / D03 / D07

Material and control connections · 2 interfaces

Interface / suggested review	Buyer: confirm	Equipment supplier: confirm	Site team: confirm
I06 · Material, oil, cake and optional downstream connections Review point to agree: Before package procurement and installation tie-in	Agree process inlet/outlet, storage/packing/treatment destinations, quality targets and which optional stages belong to this contract.	Identify transfer rates, connection geometry, contact-material/cleaning scope, pumps/conveyors/filters and solids-return exclusions.	Confirm physical tie-ins, storage/handling and cleaning/changeover arrangements; identify gaps between separately supplied packages.
Deliverable to agree: Tie-in list and material-flow balance boundary, equipment inclusion list and interface ownership. RFQ: E01–E06 / R04 · Comparison: B03 / B05 / E01–E06 / R04 · Acceptance: D01 / D03 / D05
I07 · Controls, instrumentation and data handover Review point to agree: Before controls integration and FAT/SAT plan agreement	State operator/data needs, permissions, retained records and who reviews cross-package operation and site emergency/control interfaces.	Define control hardware/software, instrument ranges/calibration references, signals/interlocks, data export and any remote support scope.	Confirm cross-package signal responsibility, integration/testing participants, network/access arrangements and as-built documentation scope.
Deliverable to agree: Control/interface list, cause-and-effect review where agreed, calibration references, data/export sample and change log. RFQ: R01 / R03 / commercial response · Comparison: B07 / C06 / R01 / R03 · Acceptance: D03 / D04 / D07 / D08

Installation, trials and handover · 5 interfaces

Interface / suggested review	Buyer: confirm	Equipment supplier: confirm	Site team: confirm
I08 · Installation readiness, checks and commissioning support Review point to agree: Before startup authorization	Identify site-ready date, feed/utilities/operators and the person authorized to accept readiness or approve a deferred item.	State installation/startup supervision, required checks, training, travel/remote support and equipment prerequisites in the offer.	Confirm installer work scope, alignment/connection records, access, utilities and the remaining pre-start checklist.
Deliverable to agree: Signed or otherwise authorized readiness record, outstanding-items list, support plan and revision-controlled installed configuration. RFQ: Commercial response / R01 / R05 · Comparison: B06 / C04 / C06 / C07 · Acceptance: D03 / D06 / D07
I09 · Trial feed, sampling, laboratory and raw data Review point to agree: Before sample shipment and measured trial	Agree representative lot/sample provision, test purpose, acceptance criteria, witnesses, laboratory selection and data access/confidentiality.	Identify actual trial machine/settings, sample requirements, measured-run plan, scale-up limits and proposed raw-data/report deliverables.	Confirm sampling access, weighing/metering, retained-sample handling, laboratory logistics and who collects each time-linked record.
Deliverable to agree: Approved run/sampling plan, chain of custody, raw files, laboratory reports, balance workbook and configuration mapping. RFQ: R01–R08 · Comparison: B02 / B05 / B07 / B08 / R01–R08 · Acceptance: D01 / D02 / D03 / D05
I10 · Factory FAT, deviations and shipment release Review point to agree: Before FAT and dispatch decisions	Agree factory witness/review authority, inspection medium, acceptance criteria and which site-only checks may be deferred.	Propose revision-controlled FAT scope and records; identify dry/simulated versus actual-feed checks, deviations and shipment prerequisites.	Confirm site-only items, installation dependencies, reception documentation and the people who will receive open/deferred issues.
Deliverable to agree: Agreed FAT protocol, actual records, deviation/retest log, deferred-site register and authorized shipment decision. RFQ: R05 / commercial response · Comparison: C04 / C07 / R05 / D04 · Acceptance: D01 / D04 / D06
I11 · Site SAT, performance review and retest Review point to agree: Before measured SAT and final release	Agree actual feed/operating envelope, witnesses, measurement/decision rules, retest responsibilities and release authority before the run.	Confirm installed configuration, technical participation, proposed performance terms and how deviations or scale-up gaps will be addressed.	Confirm actual utilities/feed readiness, measured periods, sample collection, site logs and closure/retest work responsibilities.
Deliverable to agree: Actual site run data, matched lab/balance reports, deviations/retests and authorized acceptance decision with exclusions. RFQ: R01–R08 / commercial response · Comparison: B04 / B08 / C07 / R01–R08 / D07 · Acceptance: D01 / D05 / D06 / D07 / D08
I12 · As-built handover, training, spares and open items Review point to agree: Before handover and closure	Identify document recipients, operating/maintenance personnel, agreed training and spares needs, warranty contacts and open-item decision authority.	Identify final equipment/configuration revisions, manuals/drawings, software/data rights, spare/wear parts, training and support deliverables.	Confirm as-built local interfaces, attended training, maintenance access and the owner/due date of each remaining site item.
Deliverable to agree: Handover register, training/spares records, as-built documents, unresolved-items ownership and authorized release/reference. RFQ: Commercial response / R05 · Comparison: C05 / C06 / C08 / D08 · Acceptance: D06 / D08

Crop-specific interfaces · 3 interfaces

Interface / suggested review	Buyer: confirm	Equipment supplier: confirm	Site team: confirm
I13 · Rapeseed identity and feed stabilization Review point to agree: Before preparation design and actual-seed trial	Confirm rapeseed/canola variety/lot and incoming conditions; identify whether stabilization/cleaning/dehulling is included.	Define actual feed envelope and offered stabilization/preparation scope for the CP2 or alternative configuration.	Confirm reception, stabilization utilities, feed transfer, weighing and sample locations.
Deliverable to agree: Actual-crop feed schedule, preparation/stabilization boundary and lot-linked baseline records. RFQ: E01 / R02 / R07 · Comparison: B02 / X02 / X03 · Acceptance: D01 / D02 / D03 / D05
I14 · CP2 first-stage, interstage and final press banks Review point to agree: Before press-bank order and performance review	Confirm two-stage mechanical duty and any separately contracted extraction route or capacity change.	Specify models/counts/revisions for both press banks, interstage transfer/control and trial-to-production differences; do not inherit an unrelated historical model list.	Confirm cake transfer, bypass/recycle rules, both-stage oil/cake samples and actual measurement access.
Deliverable to agree: Two-bank schedule, interstage interface drawings, stage/overall balance and configuration records. RFQ: E02–E03 / R01 / R06 · Comparison: B07 / X01 / R06 · Acceptance: D03 / D05 / D07
I15 · Rapeseed cold-press definition and oil/cake quality Review point to agree: Before product criteria agreement and actual-oil tests	Agree product definition, temperature observation points and any requested chlorophyll/fatty-acid/cake analyses on the actual crop.	Separate press performance, oil filtration and any additional actual-oil treatment; propose method/basis and measurement deliverables.	Confirm temperature/sample access, filtration/solids/treatment tie-ins and matched laboratory and site records.
Deliverable to agree: Actual-lot temperature and product-quality records, method/sample IDs and any separate treatment result. RFQ: E04–E05 / R07–R08 · Comparison: B05 / X02 / X03 · Acceptance: D01 / D05 / D07 / D08

Fields left blank for the actual agreement

Project / route / interface ID and revision: ____________________
Actual buyer / contracting supplier / site contractor or team: ____________________
Agreed boundary / drawing or connection ID / inclusion or exclusion: ____________________
Input provider / supplier / installer or connector / checker: ____________________
Responsible owner / reviewer / authorized approver: ____________________
Agreed deliverable / document ID / revision / evidence location: ____________________
Agreed review point / prerequisites / due date: ____________________
Open question / change / deviation / retest and its owner: ____________________
Actual completion evidence / review status / unresolved item: ____________________
Authorized decision / exceptions / names / signatures / dates: ____________________

Record the actual document and authorized decision; receiving a drawing or checking a box does not itself release an interface or prove acceptance.

Existing documents: RFQ scope · RFQ template · Comparison table · Comparison CSV · Trial and D01–D08 register · Trial / acceptance template.

Compare documented suppliers · Processing route · Source categories and open evidence requests

↑ Project stages and downloads

Rapeseed / canola dispatch, startup and handover review

THREE REVIEW POINTS · EVIDENCE · ISSUES AND AUTHORIZED DECISIONS

Rapeseed / canola dispatch, startup and handover review

Editorial document-readiness and issue-closeout questions for dispatch, site startup and final handover. This is a blank planning register, not an equipment operating procedure, site readiness certificate, permission to energize/start machinery or a completed acceptance decision.

The three review points and evidence requests must be agreed by the actual project parties. No supplier responsibility, mandatory milestone, technical limit, completion status or release authority is assigned by this page. Existing RFQ, comparison, interface and trial evidence boundaries remain unchanged.

Download blank Rapeseed / canola readiness / closeout register · Issue-closeout guide (TXT)

Actual owners, due dates, evidence, status and authorized decisions are blank. Agree the review points with the project parties. This register does not supply operating steps or permission to start machinery.

G01 · Before dispatch: factory records and deferred site items · 5 questions

Question / linked scope	Confirm before the agreed activity	Evidence to request and review
S01 · Freeze the offered configuration and boundary I01 / I02 / I06 / I07 RFQ: E01–E06 / R01 Comparison: B01 / B03 / B07 / C01 Acceptance: D01 / D03	Reconcile the agreed equipment, options, exclusions, actual parties and latest drawings with the quotation and interface register; record any changed assumption.	Approved revision list, equipment schedule, scope/interface changes and the actual decision reference.
S02 · Review actual factory test evidence I07 / I09 / I10 RFQ: R01 / R03 / R05 Comparison: C07 / R01 / R03 / R05 / D04 Acceptance: D03 / D04 / D05	Separate actual-feed, dry and simulated checks. Match the performed test configuration, protocol, raw records and witnesses to the agreed FAT scope; do not infer a performance pass from a video or catalogue.	Actual FAT record, configuration/calibration references, raw files and documented limitations.
S03 · Carry deviations and site-only checks forward I08 / I10 / I11 RFQ: R05 / commercial response Comparison: C04 / C07 / D04 / D06 / D07 Acceptance: D04 / D06 / D07	Give every unresolved factory issue a document reference, proposed action, responsible party and site implication; obtain the agreed decision about retest, correction or deferral.	Deviation/retest log, deferred-site list, reasons, owners/dates and authorized decision.
S04 · Confirm dispatch and receiving documentation I03 / I08 / I10 / I12 RFQ: Commercial response Comparison: C04 / C06 / D08 Acceptance: D04 / D06 / D08	Agree packing/identification, handling information, receiving responsibilities, delivery prerequisites, relevant documents and the person authorized to decide shipment.	Packing/identification register, delivery/handling documents, site receiving plan and actual shipment decision.
S05 · Rapeseed two-bank and preparation scope I13 / I14 / I15 RFQ: E01–E05 / R01 Comparison: B02 / B07 / X01 / X03 Acceptance: D01 / D03 / D04	Confirm actual rapeseed/canola identity, preparation/stabilization and model/count/revision for both press stages. Do not inherit an unrelated historical equipment list or mustard data.	Two-bank and interstage schedule, preparation boundary and actual-crop specification.

Record actual prerequisite, owner, due date, evidence, review status, decision authority and scope/exceptions in the blank register. No review outcome is supplied here.

G02 · Before site startup: installed scope and test readiness · 5 questions

Question / linked scope	Confirm before the agreed activity	Evidence to request and review
S06 · Reconcile the installed equipment and site interfaces I03 / I04 / I05 / I06 / I07 / I08 RFQ: E01–E06 / R01 Comparison: B03 / B06 / B07 / E01–E06 Acceptance: D03 / D06 / D07	Review the actual installed configuration, drawings, connection boundaries and local installation records with the named project parties. List missing or changed interfaces for their review.	Installed/as-built revision list, civil/material/electrical/utility/control interface records and unresolved items.
S07 · Confirm feed, samples, utilities and people for the planned run I02 / I05 / I07 / I08 / I09 RFQ: R02–R04 / commercial response Comparison: B02 / B04 / B05 / B06 / B08 Acceptance: D01 / D02 / D03 / D05 / D07	Agree actual feed lot and preparation, sample/laboratory arrangements, utility availability, metering, operator/trial support and access to time-linked raw data.	Lot/sample register, agreed run plan, utility/meter/calibration references and named participants.
S08 · Review the SAT criteria and deferred factory items I09 / I10 / I11 RFQ: R05 / R06–R08 Comparison: C07 / R05 / D06 / D07 Acceptance: D01 / D05 / D06 / D07	Before measurement, agree method/basis, observation period, decision rule, witnesses, actual scope and who reviews each deferred issue; keep proposed guarantees separate from agreed criteria.	Agreed SAT protocol, criteria/method matrix, deferred-item mapping and review authority.
S09 · Record the actual readiness decision and remaining questions I01 / I08 / I11 RFQ: Commercial response / R05 Comparison: C04 / C07 / D06 / D07 Acceptance: D06 / D07	Have the authorized project parties review missing prerequisites and deviations. Record whether an item blocks the proposed activity or is deferred under an agreed decision; the editorial checklist supplies no permission to start equipment.	Actual readiness review, outstanding actions, agreed prerequisites and authorization reference with scope/exceptions.
S10 · Rapeseed stage measurements and actual seed readiness I13 / I14 / I15 RFQ: R02 / R06–R08 Comparison: B05 / B08 / X01 / X02 / X03 Acceptance: D01 / D02 / D03 / D05 / D07	Agree incoming seed/stabilization, interstage transfer/recycle, both-stage sample/temperature points and actual crop/product analyses before the measured site run.	Actual-lot run plan, stage/overall sampling map and agreed temperature/quality basis.

Record actual prerequisite, owner, due date, evidence, review status, decision authority and scope/exceptions in the blank register. No review outcome is supplied here.

G03 · Before final handover: evidence, open items and authorized release · 5 questions

Question / linked scope	Confirm before the agreed activity	Evidence to request and review
S11 · Reconcile actual performance and laboratory records I02 / I07 / I09 / I11 RFQ: R01–R08 Comparison: B04 / B05 / B07 / B08 / R01–R08 Acceptance: D02 / D03 / D05 / D07	Link site feed/configuration, raw measured periods, matched samples, laboratory methods and mass/oil balances to the agreed criteria. Keep estimates, results and scale-up assumptions distinct.	SAT raw records, sample-linked lab reports, balance workbook and the actual criteria/result review.
S12 · Review correction, retest and accepted deferral evidence I10 / I11 / I12 RFQ: R05 / commercial response Comparison: C07 / D06 / D07 / D08 Acceptance: D06 / D07 / D08	For each issue, retain the original problem, agreed action and the evidence reviewed after correction/retest. Any remaining deferral needs its scope, owner, date and authorized decision recorded.	Linked issue/action/retest records, reviewer decision, residual open-item list and approval references.
S13 · Check document, training, spares and support delivery I07 / I08 / I12 RFQ: Commercial response Comparison: C05 / C06 / C08 / D08 Acceptance: D03 / D06 / D08	Compare the actual as-built/manual/control-data, training, spare/wear-part, warranty and support records against the agreed delivery list; record missing documents separately from equipment performance.	Handover document register with revisions/receipt/review, training/spares/support records and gaps.
S14 · Record release authority, exceptions and continuing ownership I01 / I11 / I12 RFQ: R05 / commercial response Comparison: C07 / D06 / D08 Acceptance: D06 / D07 / D08	Identify the people authorized to decide final handover, the actual scope and excluded/deferred items. Keep evidence and unresolved responsibilities accessible after the decision.	Actual signed or otherwise authorized handover decision, scope/exceptions, open-item owners and retained document locations.
S15 · Rapeseed stage balance, temperature and quality closeout I13 / I14 / I15 RFQ: R04 / R06–R08 Comparison: X01 / X02 / X03 Acceptance: D05 / D06 / D07 / D08	Keep stage and overall balances consistent without double-counting recycle. Review actual temperature/product-quality data and any separately scoped oil treatment against agreed criteria.	Two-stage/overall balance, actual-lot temperature and lab reports and authorized decision with exceptions.

Record actual prerequisite, owner, due date, evidence, review status, decision authority and scope/exceptions in the blank register. No review outcome is supplied here.

Close an issue with evidence and an authorized disposition

Log the question and its affected scope
Keep the original issue ID/date, configuration/lot/document revision, affected interface and review point, source evidence and the question requiring a decision.
Agree the decision needed before the next activity
Have the named authorized parties state the prerequisite/evidence and whether the issue affects dispatch, the proposed site activity or handover. Any deferral needs an agreed reason, scope and review authority.
Record action, owner, due date and required evidence
Separate the action provider, responsible coordinator, reviewer and decision-maker. Record the drawing/data/correction/retest to be provided; leave unagreed assignments open.
Retain correction/retest evidence and its review
Link actual dated records to the original issue and agreed criterion/basis. A promised action, uploaded file, photograph or checked box alone is not verified closure.
Record the authorized disposition and remaining obligations
Keep the actual decision/reference, scope/exceptions, signatures or other agreed authorization, retained records and any continuing open-item owner. Do not erase the original issue after closure.

Blank issue fields and status labels

Project / route / review point / item or issue ID: ____________________
Actual parties / configuration / lot / document revisions: ____________________
Affected interface / RFQ / comparison / D01-D08 reference: ____________________
Required prerequisite / evidence / agreed decision rule: ____________________
Action provider / responsible owner / reviewer / authorized decision-maker: ____________________
Action / required document or retest / due date: ____________________
Actual evidence ID / revision / date / retained location: ____________________
Current status / unresolved gap / reason and scope of any deferral: ____________________
Authorized decision / exceptions / continuing owner / decision reference: ____________________
Names / authority / signatures / dates: ____________________

Labels to agree: Awaiting agreement · Evidence requested · Action or retest pending · Evidence under review · Deferred with authorized reference · Closed with reviewed evidence and decision · Not applicable with agreed reason. No status is preselected. Missing records remain open questions, not assumed completion or acceptance.

Processing route · Compare documented supplier scope · Evidence categories and open requests

↑ Project stages and downloads

Fictional filling examples and pre-submission review

FICTIONAL TEACHING EXAMPLES · MANUAL REVIEW

Fictional filling examples and pre-submission review

FICTIONAL TRAINING DATA ONLY — not a supplier test, machine/crop performance, recommended operating condition, guarantee or acceptance record. All IDs, quantities, dates, methods and source references are invented. The arbitrary sunflower route label only illustrates a category; the same exercise is shown on all four routes.

Worked teaching examples and a manual review checklist, not an automated validator. Original blank forms and real supplier/research evidence remain separate. Unresolved mismatches stay open; a completed example is not a project approval.

Download untouched blank forms · Read real supplier evidence and gaps separately

Before submitting actual project data

Keep an untouched copy of the originals and record project/run/configuration/lot/period IDs. Replace every DEMO value in a fresh blank form; never submit this workbook as evidence.
Check timestamps, offsets, phase and downtime; identical IDs alone are insufficient. Confirm the weighed-feed and meter intervals match.
Check stream/meter boundaries, units, calibration/multiplier references, sample matrix, method edition and wet/dry reporting basis.
Identify duplicated measurements, recirculation and overlapping parent/child meters before aggregation. Retain evidence of any correction and the original value.
Keep unknown inputs and unavailable results visible. Obtain missing sources or trace the question into the existing issue-closeout register; do not turn blanks or invalid ratios into zero.
Transfer only supported, comparable values into the quote/test comparison while retaining original units and sources. Agree actual test criteria and authorized FAT/SAT decisions separately.

Eight fictional review cases

Match meter and weighed feed windows

DEMO-MATCH · invented values, not actual performance

Fictional readings 100 to 108 kWh, factor 1 and 1000 kg feed over the same hour give 8 kWh and 8 kWh/t. This arithmetic says nothing about a real process, throughput, oil recovery or plant acceptance.

Next action: Check clock, configuration, lot, stream and boundary before transferring a result to the comparison.

Invented reference: DEMO-METER-MATCH / DEMO-FEED-1

Same ID, different timestamps

DEMO-TIME · invented values, not actual performance

The meter window 00:30–01:30 differs from feed 00:00–01:00. A repeated Period ID does not make the denominator valid. Do not report a matched kWh/t.

Next action: Request corresponding feed and meter observations for exactly the same interval; preserve the original row.

Invented reference: DEMO-METER-TIME

Unknown multiplier is not one

DEMO-FACTOR · invented values, not actual performance

The blank multiplier is unknown. Do not silently reuse the factor from another meter or return zero. No normalized result is available from this row.

Next action: Obtain the applicable multiplier and its source before calculating.

Invented reference: DEMO-METER-FACTOR

End reading below start

DEMO-RESET · invented values, not actual performance

The invented 100-to 90 readings need reset/rollover investigation. Do not report negative consumption or clamp it to zero.

Next action: Retain original readings and request a corrected, documented interval reconstruction.

Invented reference: DEMO-METER-RESET

Equal number, unequal reporting basis

DEMO-BASIS · invented values, not actual performance

Both invented sample values are 5%, but one is wet basis and one dry basis. They are not equivalent; no moisture or suitable conversion evidence is supplied.

Next action: Retain the two originals. Request comparable basis, methods and matching sample moisture before any separate conversion.

Invented reference: DEMO-NOT-A-LAB-REPORT-WB / DB

The same feed observation appears twice

DEMO-DUPLICATE · invented values, not actual performance

Two log rows reference the same 1000 kg feed observation, interval and stream. Counting both would invent 2000 kg. This exercise does not supply an oil or full mass balance.

Next action: Identify duplicates using IDs, timestamps, stream and original source; retain history and use the measured feed once.

Invented reference: DEMO-FEED-1 (duplicated)

Child meter is inside parent boundary

DEMO-OVERLAP · invented values, not actual performance

The child’s invented 3 kWh is already part of the parent’s 8 kWh. Adding both would double-count part of the boundary.

Next action: Choose a non-overlapping meter set and document included/excluded circuits; do not infer a whole-plant total.

Invented reference: DEMO-METER-MATCH / DEMO-METER-CHILD

Measured zero differs from blank

DEMO-ZERO-FEED · invented values, not actual performance

The stopped interval explicitly records zero feed and 2 kWh. Keep the stop and energy observations, but do not divide by zero or report a zero kWh/t result.

Next action: Preserve downtime. Aggregate only compatible, documented windows with a positive measured feed denominator.

Invented reference: DEMO-METER-STOP / DEMO-FEED-STOP

These are worked interpretations, not spreadsheet formulas or automatic data-validation results. Source gaps require actual evidence; no example closes a real project issue.

Compare only supported, compatible records · Keep acceptance criteria and decisions separate · Track unresolved data to closure · Project stages and downloads

↑ Project stages and downloads

Rapeseed / canola — Blank production-record forms

BLANK WORKING FORMS · RUNS, SAMPLES AND METER WINDOWS

Rapeseed / canola — Blank production-record forms

Use the same project, run, configuration, lot and period IDs across the three forms. Download the Excel workbook for all forms together or individual CSV files; complete them locally alongside the original source records.

Independent editorial collection forms. All entry cells are blank; no supplier measurement, guarantee, completed acceptance or authorized signoff is supplied. CSV files have no formulas, formatting or validation; the workbook has route/phase choice lists but no calculations. Keep original evidence files alongside the forms.

Each form has 20 blank entry rows; add rows as needed. No measured value, default meter factor, acceptance limit or approval is prefilled. The guide explains every column and the differences between blank, zero and not applicable.

Run log

One row per observation period and stream; record stopped intervals explicitly.

Sample register

One row per sample/analysis; retain the same Sample ID for additional analyses of that sample.

Energy readings

One row per meter and observation window; keep utilities and boundaries separate.

How to keep periods, units and source boundaries consistent

Create stable project, run, configuration, lot and period IDs; reuse them across all three forms. Duplicate blank rows as needed. A changed configuration or feed lot needs a new reference and a clear transition. Import ID and ISO timestamp columns as text when opening CSV to preserve leading zeros and timezone offsets.

Use timestamp offsets and a synchronized clock. A period is an observation window, not proof of continuous operation. Split rows whenever phase, lot, configuration or operating state changes; include downtime reasons and intervals.

Mass rows describe separate streams. Do not add raw and prepared feed together, count recirculation as new feed, or sum parent and child meters. Document inventory changes, rejects and the inlet/outlet boundary in the original evidence.

Sample ID may repeat for different analyses of the same physical sample. Keep matrix, method/edition, laboratory, original result/unit/basis and report/custody references together. A generic method name is not proof of matrix suitability.

Use cumulative readings in the energy form. For a valid non-reset electrical meter in kWh, energy is (end reading minus start reading) times documented multiplier. Divide by same-window weighed feed kg / 1000 for kWh per tonne. This is guidance only; the forms calculate nothing.

Do not calculate when a reading, multiplier, weighed mass, source or interval match is missing. A blank is unknown, not zero; only record zero when actually observed. Resolve resets, rollovers, invalid intervals and zero-feed periods before reporting an intensity.

Motor kW/HP is rated power, not cumulative energy. Keep electricity, steam and fuel in original units and separate rows. Any conversion to a common energy unit needs documented assumptions, boundary and separate review; no automatic conversion is provided.

Keep startup, steady, stopped and shutdown records identifiable. Comparing savings requires a matched baseline and duty; a savings claim is not total line consumption. Do not infer availability, annual capacity or acceptance from a short run.

These are internal working records. Share the completed file only through an agreed project channel; this website does not collect or send entries. Keep originals, revisions and source references; signatures and contractual criteria belong in separately agreed documents.

Use these records with the existing project documents

Project stages and complete download list

↑ Project stages and downloads

Rapeseed / canola production records: what is still needed

PRODUCTION RECORDS · PUBLISHED SCOPE AND OPEN REQUESTS

Rapeseed / canola production records: what is still needed

Read what the reviewed public material actually establishes before requesting production records. These are editorial evidence requests, not supplier rankings or agreed acceptance criteria.

No configuration-matched raw continuous-run log, lot-linked laboratory pack or whole-line metered energy report was obtained for these four enquiry examples. This describes this review, not the existence of private supplier records. Catalogue ratings, service descriptions, customer narratives and planned capacities remain distinct.

Farmet CP2 — two-stage cold-pressing enquiry example

Evidence reviewed: Technology description and historical installation announcement

Farmet’s 23 May 2023 announcement describes a mainly-rapeseed CP2 installation with FS4015 presses, automatic filtration and FIC. It states a planned capacity of up to 300 tonnes of seeds per day. CP2’s technology page separately describes two pressing stages and optional preparation equipment.

Limit: A planned daily capacity is not observed production. FS4015 belongs to that historical project; it does not select the press sizes or count for the current CP2 enquiry. FIC availability alone does not supply run or meter exports.

Official sources, dates and review scope

Reviewed 3 November 2026. Sources were retrieved directly; a successful page response is not independent validation of its performance claims. The customer account is hosted by the equipment supplier.

farmet cp2

farmet project

farmet trial

Continuous run

Original matched record not obtained in this review

Request the offered first/final press models and counts, interstage sampling, run hours/stops, actual weighed seed and separate oil/cake streams. Keep the historical FS4015 project outside the offered bill unless explicitly selected.

RFQ R01 / R03 Compare on the same basis Delivery D01 / D03 / D05 Track missing evidence to closure

Representative lot

Original matched record not obtained in this review

Request variety/lot, seed temperature, moisture/oil analyses, preparation and both-stage sample IDs. Link any cold-press or finished-oil claim to agreed temperature locations and analytical records.

RFQ R02 / R04 Compare on the same basis Delivery D02 / D05 Track missing evidence to closure

Whole-line energy

Original matched record not obtained in this review

Request synchronized meter and FIC exports for both press stages, conveyors, stabilization, separation and filtration. Identify omitted site loads, measured tonnes and startup/steady intervals.

RFQ R03 / R04 Compare on the same basis Delivery D02 / D03 / D05 Track missing evidence to closure

Existing supplier evidence and limits · Academic research and transfer limits

Metered electricity per tonne uses the energy-meter difference divided by weighed feed tonnes over the same interval. Motor kW or HP is a rating, not an energy reading. Keep thermal energy separate unless an explicit conversion and boundary are agreed. These are editorial comparison rules; no actual result or guarantee is entered here.

Project stages and existing downloads

↑ Project stages and downloads

Rapeseed / canola research evidence for selection questions

PUBLIC RESEARCH · APPARATUS AND FEED BASIS · LIMITS TO TRANSFER

Rapeseed / canola research evidence for selection questions

Source-bounded public research examples for asking better selection and trial questions. These are published study results or abstract statements, not our tests, supplier quotations, production guarantees or customer-signed acceptance records.

Published experimental apparatus, feed matrix, reporting basis and evidence depth are shown separately. Do not transfer a result to the representative RFQ model without configuration-matched feed trials and agreed criteria. No existing supplier capability grade or acceptance status is changed.

Farmer 20-duo rapeseed pressing study

Mizera, Herák, Hrabě and Kabutey. Agronomy Research 16(S1):1118–1123,2018; DOI 10.15159/AR.18.059. Published: 2018. Reviewed: 2026-11-03.

Evidence depth: Full experimental paper

Material and apparatus: Rapeseed on a Farmet Farmer 20-duo, with tested speeds 10–65 rpm. The paper defines recovery against Soxhlet-determined oil in seed; this is not a CP2 production-package test.

Reported observation	Value and reporting basis
Highest reported recovery Published experimental result	82.6% at the lowest tested speed Peak recovery; not the same operating point as the conclusion’s energy/throughput compromise. Locator: Abstract; Conclusion,p. 1122
Conclusion’s compromise point Reported conclusion/model-derived point	20 kg seed/h; 76.3% recovery; 0.61 kWh/kg oil The energy value is model-derived using Eq. 2 and is per kilogram of oil, not per kilogram of seed or total plant consumption. Locator: Conclusion,p. 1122

Reported observation

Value and reporting basis

Highest reported recovery

Published experimental result

82.6% at the lowest tested speed

Peak recovery; not the same operating point as the conclusion’s energy/throughput compromise.

Locator: Abstract; Conclusion,p. 1122

Conclusion’s compromise point

Reported conclusion/model-derived point

20 kg seed/h; 76.3% recovery; 0.61 kWh/kg oil

The energy value is model-derived using Eq. 2 and is per kilogram of oil, not per kilogram of seed or total plant consumption.

Locator: Conclusion,p. 1122

Do not transfer beyond this scope: Discussion,p. 1121 also cites 25 kg/h and about 0.5 kWh/kg oil; do not merge these with the conclusion into one universal optimum. Actual nozzle/feed conditions and a CP2 scale-up basis remain to confirm.

Source, access depth and review boundary

University repository record and complete 6-page paper retrieved directly HTTP200; conclusion visually checked.

Primary publisher / institutional record · Study DOI

Read the original full paper at its publisher / university repository

Public study evidence does not replace a configuration-matched trial or a signed customer FAT/SAT record.

Use the evidence in your existing enquiry and comparison

The following are editorial requests. Ask for the actual offered configuration and representative-feed records; do not copy the study’s numbers into guarantee or acceptance cells.

Request model/count/revision for both proposed press stages and actual test mapping.
RFQ: R01 / R06 · Comparison: B07 / X01 · Acceptance: D03
Keep maximum recovery and the selected throughput/energy operating point separate.
RFQ: R03 / R04 · Comparison: B04 / R03 / R04 · Acceptance: D05
State seed/oil denominators, metering boundary, feed properties and repeatability.
RFQ: R02 / R03 · Comparison: B02 / B06 / B08 · Acceptance: D02 / D03 / D05
Obtain actual-lot temperature and agreed oil/cake-quality reports before acceptance.
RFQ: R05 / R07 / R08 · Comparison: X02 / X03 / R05 · Acceptance: D01 / D07

Read the existing representative supplier’s scope and evidence limits · Plan representative-feed trials · Project stages and existing downloads

↑ Project stages and downloads

Rapeseed / canola project documents

PROJECT DOCUMENTS · USE WHAT YOU NEED NOW

Rapeseed / canola project documents

Start with the material and process route, then use the five document stages below. Include trial criteria in the enquiry and revisit earlier steps whenever feed, configuration or scope changes.

Before the enquiry: Review this processing route · Read the evidence categories · Public research examples and limits · Production records and open requests · Blank record forms · Fictional filling examples and review.

1 Prepare an enquiry
Set the feed, process boundary, required output and test-data requests before asking for an offer.
Equipment RFQ · TXT
Include the trial / acceptance plan early.
2 Compare offers and test data
Retain original values, units, reporting bases and source documents. Record missing or mismatched items.
Blank comparison · CSV
3 Confirm interfaces and responsibilities
Agree the actual parties, connections, deliverables, owners and review authority.
Interface register · TXT
4 Plan trials and acceptance evidence
Agree methods, criteria and FAT/SAT scope before testing; retain actual results and authorized decisions.
Trial / acceptance · TXT
5 Review readiness and close issues
Use dispatch, site-startup and handover reviews to track evidence, deviations, retests and remaining decisions.
Readiness register · TXT

These are editorial planning documents and blank templates. Supplier listings and official-source descriptions do not establish a quotation, agreed responsibility, test result or accepted plant.

All Rapeseed / canola downloads · 15 files (13 preserved + 2 fictional examples)

Shared guides

Blank production-record forms

Fictional filling examples (not real evidence)

Rapeseed / canola: evidence and process gaps

SOURCE · TEST SUPPORT · PROJECT · ACCEPTANCE

Rapeseed / canola: evidence and process gaps

Evidence categories describe what is documented, not supplier ability, quality, ranking, certification or approval for a crop.

Editorial organization of 49 extended dossiers, one retained access exception and 106 product-scope directory additions; no supplier certification.

48
extended dossiers linked here

141
original profiles retained

0
complete signed reports obtained

Source material

Company website material: 135
Supplier-posted platform material: 3
Legacy catalogue / revision unconfirmed: 2
Access unresolved / no extended review: 1

Test-support evidence

Published test-support description: 19
Pilot equipment / R&D offering; service to confirm: 3
Reported run / internal checks; scope limited: 7
Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed: 111
No extended trial review: 1

Project material

Named supplier project account: 12
Site, country, order or caption account: 11
Facility, service or application reference: 7
No attributable project established: 110
No extended project review: 1

A test-service, pilot-equipment or internal-test description is not your actual-feed result. Confirm equipment, samples, measurements and reporting. A named supplier account is not signed acceptance, independent verification or automatic relevance to your crop; historical, construction and other-material limits remain in each dossier.

No complete readable signed customer FAT/SAT dataset was obtained in this reviewed collection. This does not mean the supplier has no such records.

CPM and Crown share group resources; ABC and BEST share branding references. Do not count related brands as independent factories or trial sites.

Rajkumar remains an access exception, outside the49 extended dossiers. Its original profile is preserved; search caches do not establish current supply.

Resolve three gates before treating a reference as your project

Current quotation: confirm the contracting party, manufacturer, model/revision, crop duty, included equipment and utilities.
Representative trial: agree samples, equipment, settings, calibrated measurements, analyses, raw records and scale-up limits. A service description alone does not pass this gate.
Agreed acceptance: obtain project-specific FAT/SAT criteria, measurements, deviations closed and authorized signed release. Supplier photos, shipment news or ceremonies alone do not pass this gate.

Process scope and the next document to request

Counts below are profiles with a reviewed product-stage reference and a route link. They are not confirmed crop-specific installations, independent factory counts or an exhaustive market survey. Read each profile's scope before shortlisting.

Stage	Profile references	Resolve before choosing
Seed preparation	57	Agree seed condition, cleaning/dehulling scope and a prepared-feed balance; record moisture and actual conditioning settings.
Mechanical pressing	49	Agree exact model/revision, feed input and operating hours; measure oil/cake balance, temperature and residual-oil analytical basis.
Solvent extraction & meal treatment	28	Agree preparation, extractor, meal treatment and solvent-recovery boundaries, utilities, specialist design and actual-feed measurements.
Oil clarification & filtration	27	Agree oil viscosity/temperature, solids loading, filter media, pressure/flow limits, cleaning and measured filtrate quality.
Oil refining & finishing	41	Agree crude-oil analyses, selected refining/dewaxing steps, utility boundaries, sampling and product/cold-test methods.
Finished-oil packaging	25	Test the actual finished oil, bottle and closure; agree fill-mass/volume calibration, speed, closure checks and cleaning.
Residue & wastewater treatment	2	Characterize the actual sludge/residue; agree separation targets, recovered-material handling and treatment test records.

Questions for this oilseed

Identify rapeseed / canola feed and the intended oil and cake / meal products.
Compare full pressing against pre-pressing plus cake extraction with the same feed and operating hours.
Agree conditioning, oil treatment and any downstream extraction / meal-treatment boundary.

Read the evidence categories for 141 original profiles

Profile	Source	Trial support	Project material	Scope / acceptance limit
ABC Machinery (KMEC)	Company website material	Reported run / internal checks; scope limited Togo soybean/peanut line: reported commissioning test run	Named supplier project account Moldova sunflower pressing/refining project account	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Accutek Packaging	Company website material	Published test-support description Accutek nozzle laboratory selection and published FAT offer	No attributable project established Installation/training services: customer-project evidence gap	Finished-oil packaging only No complete readable signed customer report obtained
AGI - Ag Growth International	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Agrowindo	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Alfa Laval	Company website material	Published test-support description Separator testing and Explorer pilot options	Named supplier project account AAK Karlshamn PX 95 LevelUP retrofit	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Alliance Industria Mecanica	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Allocco - MAPCA	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Amafilter	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Anderson International	Company website material	Published test-support description Stow Mini Expeller feasibility studies	Named supplier project account MIDIKA toll/pilot crushing project	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Andreotti Impianti	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Tailored special plants: public configuration-trial evidence gap	Named supplier project account Carrinho Angola commissioning report and separate soybean project award	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
ANDRITZ Separation	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Antti-Teollisuus	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Beccaria	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
BEST Oil Press Machinery	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Factory visits, project evaluation and installation/debugging	Site, country, order or caption account Russia rapeseed / Uzbekistan sunflower installation accounts	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
BIN	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Borghi Industrial Equipments	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Brissun Technologies	Company website material	Pilot equipment / R&D offering; service to confirm Brissun pilot plants and R&D testing facilities	No attributable project established Turnkey project overview: named acceptance evidence gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
BRONTO	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Bühler Group	Company website material	Published test-support description Grain Innovation Center: preparation trials	Facility, service or application reference Grain Innovation Center opening, October 2024	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Can-Seed Equipment	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Canapuglia	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Hemp processing, analysis and courses: core-crop trial scope unconfirmed	No attributable project established Booking / processing-service pages: comparable acceptance evidence gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Captains Group	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
CDA	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Changing Nepal	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Cimbria	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
CPM (incl. CPM Crown)	Company website material	Published test-support description Waterloo testing lab and shared CPM \| Crown Innovation Center	Facility, service or application reference CPM \| Crown GIC facility description, February 2026	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Croll Reynolds	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Crown Iron Works	Company website material	Published test-support description CPM Crown GIC and Liquids Pilot Plant	Facility, service or application reference Crown Global Innovation Center facility reference	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Desmet	Company website material	Published test-support description Desmet pilot hall and Kuala Lumpur refining R&D	Site, country, order or caption account Germany Reflex shipment and installation-stage reference	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
DESMI	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Dinnissen Process Technology	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
DVC Process Technologies	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
E-One Machinery	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
E-PAK Machinery	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed E-PAK product/container sample guidance: trial evidence gap	No attributable project established Custom-engineering guidance: no named accepted oil project established	Finished-oil packaging only No complete readable signed customer report obtained
EMS-Pellet - EMS Oil	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Fabrimaq	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Farmet	Company website material	Published test-support description Farmet laboratory and pilot centre	Named supplier project account Hungary rapeseed CP2 commissioning reference	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
FAUDI	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
FERMETECH	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Filmatic Packaging Systems	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
FILTROX	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Florapower GmbH	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Flottweg	Company website material	Published test-support description Process Center feasibility and scale-up work	Facility, service or application reference Seed/press-oil application reference; customer acceptance gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
French Oil Mill Machinery	Company website material	Published test-support description Innovation Center customer-material trials	Named supplier project account Can Pro Ingredients canola development and startup	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Gagan International	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Engineering, installation and commissioning support: seed-trial scope unconfirmed	No attributable project established Commissioning / handover claims: named acceptance evidence gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
GEA Group	Company website material	Published test-support description Process Test Center and Remote FAT services	Facility, service or application reference Oelde Process Test Center expansion plan, September 2026	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Gianazza International	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Commissioning / training services: sample-trial scope unconfirmed	Site, country, order or caption account Colombia PHYSITRON CSF caption: historical acceptance gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Gobind Expeller	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Inspection and after-sales descriptions: seed-trial scope unconfirmed	No attributable project established Quality labels / global presence: customer acceptance evidence gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Gopal Expeller Company	Supplier-posted platform material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Quality-assurance tests: actual-seed trial scope unconfirmed	No attributable project established Hosted ratings / reviews: project-acceptance gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Graham Manufacturing	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Harburg-Freudenberger	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed HF equipment testing and inspection; pilot-trial scope unconfirmed	Facility, service or application reference EP16 to EP20 conversion-kit offering, not a customer acceptance case	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
HAUS Centrifuge Technologies	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
HellasPack	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
HEMA	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Henan Doing	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Installation, machine testing and worker-training service	Site, country, order or caption account Nigeria peanut and Azerbaijan sunflower orders — 2026	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Henan Huatai	Company website material	Reported run / internal checks; scope limited DR Congo palm-fruit project: reported trial run, July 2023	Site, country, order or caption account Ethiopia multi-seed processing: June 2021 operation report	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
HISAKA WORKS	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
HUM Oil & Fat Technologies	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed HUM engineering services: configuration-trial evidence gap	No attributable project established Kazakhstan engineering/manufacturing and European rapeseed-cake handover	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Industrias Savini	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Japan Machinery Store	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Jas Enterprise	Company website material	Reported run / internal checks; scope limited Manufacturing checks and development trials: customer-trial scope unconfirmed	No attributable project established Company capability statements: named acceptance evidence gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
JET-VAC Technologies	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
JJ-Lurgi Engineering	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
JK Machinery	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
KERNKRAFT / oil press GmbH & Co. KG	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Koerting Hannover	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Kongskilde Industries	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
KULP Packaging Machinery	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Kumar Metal Industries	Company website material	Published test-support description OM Innovation Centre: instrumented pilot trials	Named supplier project account GSFIL Ghana shea-nut case, published October 2021	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
LIM Servotecnital	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
LIPICO Technologies	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Mecmar	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Mectech Process Engineers	Company website material	Pilot equipment / R&D offering; service to confirm Mectech pilot-plant supply for refining and oil/fat development	No attributable project established Published avocado/hazelnut refinery installation claims	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Mepu	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Metro Equipment	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
MEYER Europe	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
MMEC - Maqbool Mughal Engineering Company	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Muar Ban Lee (MBL)	Company website material	Reported run / internal checks; scope limited EK-300-K internal testing since 2013: palm-kernel scope	No attributable project established Palm-kernel plant gallery: material and acceptance gap	Conditional oil-filtration reference only No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Muez-Hest	Company website material	Published test-support description Muez-Hest R&D Centre: laboratory and pilot-scale validation	Named supplier project account B. N. Agritech sunflower dewaxing; August 2024 refinery listing	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
MULMIX	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Myande Group	Company website material	Published test-support description Myande Innovation and Technology Center	Named supplier project account Dianxue refinery acceptance ceremony report	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
N&T Engitech	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Commissioning and technical support: seed-trial scope unconfirmed	No attributable project established Tanzania project listing: detailed acceptance evidence gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Neostarpack	Company website material	Published test-support description Neostarpack sample testing, remote FAT and site SAT workflow	Site, country, order or caption account Japanese soy-sauce packaging case: cross-product reference	Finished-oil packaging only No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Nita Labeling Systems	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
OCME	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Oil-Press-Machine.com	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Selection / design / installation advice: sample-trial scope unconfirmed	No attributable project established Solution examples / Huatai project captions: provenance and acceptance gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Oilseed Technologies Magdeburg	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Oiltek	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Olexa	Company website material	Published test-support description Olexa testing station and feed-specific configuration	No attributable project established Review 2025: sunflower expansion and rapeseed/sunflower construction	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
OLIS	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Oliver Manufacturing	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Packserv	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
PACK’R	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
PETKUS Technologie	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Porvair Filtration Group	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
POSIMAT	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Prado Silos	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
ProFruit Machinery	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Rajkumar Agro Engineers	Access unresolved / no extended review	No extended trial review Official source access unresolved	No extended project review No extended review	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary Not established; source access unresolved
Reinartz	Company website material	Published test-support description Operational press testing through rental	Named supplier project account Pirahy Alimentos rice-bran reference and research	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
RIELA	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Ropak Manufacturing	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Russell Finex	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Saro Agro Industrial	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
SATIVA ADVICES SERVICES - PROENERGY	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Seed Oil Press	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Installation / debugging / training: feed-trial scope unconfirmed	Site, country, order or caption account Malawi 2011 export and country-labelled cases: historical acceptance gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Serac	Company website material	Published test-support description Jean-Jacques-Graffin Innovation Center: packaging tests	Named supplier project account Lesieur edible-oil installation; Food Union dairy FAT/SAT account	Finished-oil packaging only No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Shandong Chemsta Machinery	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Sharma Expeller Company	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Running-video sections and after-sales support: trial scope unconfirmed	No attributable project established Company counters / running videos: named acceptance evidence gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Sharplex Filters	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Shibuya Corporation	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Shreeji Expeller Industries	Supplier-posted platform material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Testing Equipment label: sample-trial scope unconfirmed	No attributable project established Hosted testimonials: acceptance and project gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Sinoder Indutech	Supplier-posted platform material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Installation / equipment testing: actual-feed trial unconfirmed	No attributable project established Group project totals / trading-company profile: attribution gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Solubag	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Spectec Techno Projects	Legacy catalogue / revision unconfirmed	Pilot equipment / R&D offering; service to confirm Pilot Projects offering: trial-service scope unconfirmed	Named supplier project account Vaibhav / SVMA legacy references: date and acceptance gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
STELA Laxhuber	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Symaga	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Talleres Belgrano	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
TANIS Seed Pro Tech	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
TECHNIBAG	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
TECHNOILOGY	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Tenco	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
TETRACO Engineering and Consultants	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Tinytech	Company website material	Reported run / internal checks; scope limited Installation/training support and historical test-run feedback	Site, country, order or caption account Uttar Pradesh mustard installation report — June 25, 2025	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
TNL Tecnal	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
TOMRA Food	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Tornum	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Troika	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Tsukishima Kikai	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
TäbyPressen	Legacy catalogue / revision unconfirmed	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Assembly / cleaning / feed instructions: customer-trial scope unconfirmed	Site, country, order or caption account Finland running-hours / customer-video references: historical evidence gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Veendeep Oiltek Exports	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Veter Packaging Machines	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Viking Pump	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
VKPAK	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Training and installation/debugging: sample-trial scope unconfirmed	No attributable project established Edible-oil line label / country-tagged customer photos: acceptance gap	Finished-oil packaging only No complete readable signed customer report obtained
VOLPAK	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Weightpack	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Westrup	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
YKL Group	Company website material	Reported run / internal checks; scope limited YTH-18 design testing / R&D: residue-trial gap	Site, country, order or caption account Indonesia 1200 MT/day KCP: supplier project account	Conditional residue treatment only No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Zanin	Company website material	Actual-feed trial scope unconfirmed Not investigated as part of this supplier-discovery addition	No attributable project established No separate project verification in this addition	Published product/process scope; read crop limits Directory listing; project performance not independently verified
Zhengzhou Dingsheng	Company website material	Reported run / internal checks; scope limited R&D workshop and laboratory: customer-trial access unconfirmed	Site, country, order or caption account Russia rapeseed-cake extraction: historical installation progress	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained
Ölwerk	Company website material	Published test-support description Ölwerk Standard / Plus / Premium test-press service	Facility, service or application reference Rental offer and test deliverables: customer-project evidence gap	Read the profile for the crop and process boundary No complete readable signed customer report obtained

Filter and compare documented references. Evidence categories are included in the comparison and downloadable brief; no enquiry is sent.

↑ Project stages and downloads

Check the model, trial plan and project evidence

Forty-nine extended reviews link official or supplier-branded catalogue configurations, trial support and dated project/application material. Supplier news about installation, shipment, construction or test facilities is kept distinct from signed customer acceptance reports. Cross-material and cross-industry examples retain their stated scope. Complete readable signed acceptance reports and test datasets have not been obtained from the selected sources. Use each profile's existing crop/stage scope; these references do not approve a complete line. Rajkumar is not included in these 49 addenda: its official domain returned a domain-connection error at this review, while a historical domain redirected to an unrelated host. Its original profile is preserved; search-cache listings do not confirm current supply.

Entity type	Oilseed
Oil content	~38–44%
Preparation	pressed whole (no dehulling)
Route at scale	pre-press + solvent extraction
Refining	usually full (bland commodity oil)
Dehulled?	No (pressed whole)
Data status	Editorial · 2026-07

Rapeseed / Canola

Rapeseed vs canola, and why it is pressed whole

Processing route: pre-press then extract at scale

Cake value and market position

Typical processing route

Key figures (indicative)

Rapeseed and canola: the same crop, different grade

Processing route

FAQ

Rapeseed / canola: from raw material to a supplier brief

Pressed product

Pre-press plus extraction

Follow the connected stages

Build the equipment shortlist

Estimate on a common basis

Request comparable supplier information

Basis for this route

Resolve the route before comparing quotations

Route choices, material streams and equipment handovers

Track these streams separately

Confirm these handovers

Equipment and subtypes for this Rapeseed / canola route

Find supplier references by processing stage

Compare scope and prepare an enquiry

Public evidence: configuration and test-record follow-up

Official-source supplier references for this route

Rapeseed / canola: representative trial and acceptance plan

1. Feed passport and representative sampling

2. Planned comparisons and observations

3. Outputs and the selection decision

T01 · Define the trial boundary and feed lot

T02 · Establish laboratory baselines

T03 · Agree a controlled comparison

T04 · Separate stabilization from the measured run

T05 · Reconcile outputs and analyse matched samples

T06 · Review scale-up and define the next gate

Laboratory methods: select the matrix and edition

FAT, SAT and handover: eight delivery groups

Follow the documented trial-support scope

Rapeseed / canola equipment enquiry

Farmet CP2 — two-stage cold-pressing enquiry example

Define the quoted process boundary

Six equipment-scope lines for the supplier response

Official catalogue and trial-service basis

Rapeseed / canola quotation and test-data comparison

Rapeseed / canola interface responsibility and delivery matrix

Rapeseed / canola dispatch, startup and handover review

Close an issue with evidence and an authorized disposition

Fictional filling examples and pre-submission review

Before submitting actual project data

Eight fictional review cases

Match meter and weighed feed windows

Same ID, different timestamps

Unknown multiplier is not one

End reading below start

Equal number, unequal reporting basis

The same feed observation appears twice

Child meter is inside parent boundary

Measured zero differs from blank

Rapeseed / canola — Blank production-record forms

Run log

Sample register

Energy readings

Use these records with the existing project documents

Rapeseed / canola production records: what is still needed

Farmet CP2 — two-stage cold-pressing enquiry example

Continuous run

Representative lot

Whole-line energy

Rapeseed / canola research evidence for selection questions

Farmer 20-duo rapeseed pressing study

Use the evidence in your existing enquiry and comparison

Rapeseed / canola project documents

Shared guides

Blank production-record forms

Fictional filling examples (not real evidence)

Rapeseed / canola: evidence and process gaps

Source material

Test-support evidence

Project material